Well peeps, if there’s one thing I’ve learned in life, it’s that the truth is like a cat—mighty independent, hates to be cornered, and will scratch the daylights out of anyone who tries to keep it locked up. The story of the JFK assassination has been gnawing at this country for over sixty years, and just when you think you’ve got a hold of it, it slips right through your fingers like a greased-up politician. They keep handing out pieces of the puzzle, but somehow, the picture never quite comes together. And why is that? Because the hands dealing the pieces have a habit of keeping the most important ones stuffed up their sleeves.

Now, I ain’t saying every conspiracy theory out there is worth the ink it’s printed with, but when the very folks who promised us the truth keep redacting it, well, that’s about as trustworthy as a used car salesman at a poker table. So, let’s take a stroll through the latest batch of revelations, the ghosts of intelligence agencies past, and the lingering stink of secrets that refuse to stay buried.

And so, dear reader, here we sit, sixty years later, staring at a history book with half the pages torn out and the other half scribbled over in black ink. They tell us to trust the system, that there’s nothing to see here—but if that were true, why do they keep locking the doors and pulling the shades? Maybe Oswald acted alone, maybe he didn’t. Maybe the government is just incompetent, or maybe they’re more organized than they’d like us to believe.

But one thing’s for certain—truth doesn’t need bodyguards. The more they try to hide it, the bigger the suspicion grows. And until they finally lay all the cards on the table, the American people will keep looking for the aces they know are missing from the deck. Because the truth has a way of washing up—sooner or later.

So here is my summary of the Discussion below on JFK Files, CIA, and Other Controversies

A panel of experts discussed the recently released JFK assassination files, raising serious questions about CIA involvement and the broader implications of government secrecy. The discussion revolved around key revelations, including:

James Angleton’s Role: New documents suggest that CIA Counterintelligence Chief James Angleton recruited Lee Harvey Oswald as a “source or contact” and closely monitored him for four years before the assassination. This raises the question: was Angleton simply incompetent, or was he actively running an operation involving Oswald?
Gary Underhill Memo: A 1967 memo details how former U.S. Army intelligence officer Gary Underhill fled Washington, D.C., the day after Kennedy’s assassination, claiming a “small clique within the CIA” was responsible. Six months later, Underhill was found dead under suspicious circumstances.
CIA & Oswald: The files confirm that Oswald was on the CIA’s radar. He had lived in the Soviet Union, visited Cuban and Soviet embassies in Mexico, and was watched by intelligence agencies. However, some panelists questioned whether he was truly a recruited CIA asset.
Lack of Full Transparency: Despite promises from presidents—including Trump—that all files would be released, redactions and missing documents remain. This fuels continued conspiracy theories.
The Mafia’s Role: Michael Franzese, a former Mafia insider, reaffirmed that the mob had longstanding resentment toward the Kennedys. He stated that the mob was involved in silencing Oswald through Jack Ruby, who was a known Mafia associate.
Oswald’s Marksmanship: Soviet intelligence had reportedly observed that Oswald was a poor shot, casting further doubt on whether he acted alone in killing JFK with three accurate shots.
Government Secrecy and Cover-ups: The panel broadened the discussion to other unresolved cases, including:
- Martin Luther King Jr.’s Assassination: Experts suspect FBI involvement and question the official story of James Earl Ray acting alone.
- Jeffrey Epstein’s Death: Franzese, having been in the same jail cell setup, asserted that Epstein could not have committed suicide under those conditions.
- Trump Assassination Attempt: There is skepticism over the lack of information about the shooter and the security failures.
The Need for Truth: The panel expressed frustration over continued government secrecy, questioning why critical historical events remain shrouded in mystery decades later. The discussion concluded with a call for full transparency, but skepticism about whether the truth will ever be fully revealed.

Key Takeaway:

While the recent document release adds new pieces to the puzzle, many critical questions remain unanswered, reinforcing suspicions of a cover-up involving the CIA, the Mafia, and other powerful entities.