[Note this is my first Draft, I will reread tomorrow and make it better.> Please send me your comments to [email protected] ]
[Courtroom Scene: Opening Statement – Counsel for the Plaintiff]
Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, I thank you for your attention. Today, I come before you not just as counsel, but as a citizen, a storyteller, and a concerned American. And as I speak, I ask you to hear me not just with your ears, but with your good sense and your gut — because this case, while wrapped in suits and statutes, is about something mighty plain: truth, trust, and a promise broken by our very own Uncle Sam.
OPENING STATEMENT (in the voice and cadence of a modern Mark Twain):
“Now, I reckon if you were to walk into any fair town square in this great country and shout, ‘Ponzi scheme!’ folks would turn their heads faster than a jackrabbit in July. You see, we Americans don’t take kindly to being swindled — not by charlatans in fancy hats, and certainly not by the government in polished shoes.”
Ladies and gentlemen, this case is about Social Security. That ol’ program we all grew up believing in — the one our paychecks politely tip their hat to every two weeks, right before Uncle Sam takes his cut. It was born in 1935, when the average American kicked the bucket around age 60 — and wouldn’t you know it, you had to be 65 just to collect it. Sounds mighty convenient, don’t it?
But that was then. Now folks live well into their 80s. Yet, instead of rethinking the plan, the government just kept stacking the cards, hoping we wouldn’t notice that the whole table’s leaning.
Now, you’ve heard of a man named Bernie Madoff. Crooked fella. Swindled billions by robbing Peter to pay Paul — using new money to keep up the illusion for the old-timers. That’s a Ponzi scheme, plain and simple. And folks, I stand here today to tell you, with all the conviction of a preacher on Sunday: Social Security has become just that — a government-sponsored Ponzi scheme.
Seven Reasons, Seven Red Flags:
Let me lay out the seven signs — seven fenceposts marking the trail — that make it clear:
- Great returns for early investors. Granny got a sweet deal. Her kids? Not so much.
- It pays the old with money from the new. Just like Madoff — except this one’s got the IRS to back it up.
- No easy transparency. Try asking how it works — you’ll get more riddles than answers.
- Funds misused. It ain’t invested to fight inflation — it’s just a dusty IOU in a drawer.
- Invested with a related party. The government borrows from itself. That’s like robbing your own piggy bank, calling it a loan, and charging yourself interest.
- The borrower (the government) likely can’t pay it back. We’re talkin’ over $100 trillion in unfunded promises — more than the total wealth of the American people.
- No outside audit. There ain’t no sheriff in this town watching the money trail.
Now if I told you all that without sayin’ the word “Social Security,” you’d say I was talkin’ about a con. And you’d be right.
But there’s more.
What makes this worse than Madoff? Three things:
- The government forces you to pay into it. That’s right. You don’t opt in — it’s taken before you ever see your full paycheck.
- They print money to keep the scheme alive. When the pot runs dry, they fire up the printing press.
- They change the rules as they go. Raise the age, cut the check, move the goalpost — all legal, all done at the stroke of a bureaucratic pen.
And it gets worse: they call your contribution a “gift.” Not a tax, no sir — a contribution. But come retirement, that gift gets taxed again. It’s like being told to bring your own lunch and then getting billed for the picnic.
The Sad Irony:
Life insurance companies — those so-called crooks the government loves to regulate — they’re required by law to be honest with their ledgers. But Social Security? No such rule. The very hand that tells others not to swindle is caught elbow-deep in the cookie jar.
The Result:
By 2035, they tell us the trust fund will be spent down. Gone. And the workforce will only be able to cover about 79% of the promised payouts. That’s a fancy way of saying: “We made you a promise we can’t keep — but don’t worry, we’ll just give you less.”
Let me be real clear, folks: this ain’t fear-mongering. This is arithmetic. This is a runaway train that needs a conductor, not a fog machine.
So, as I close, I ask you to consider this:
Would you sign up for something that looks like this? Would you call it a retirement plan? A safety net? Or would you call it what it is — a beautifully branded, elegantly worded Ponzi scheme, run not by a man in a dark alley, but by the suits in D.C.?
Ladies and gentlemen, Social Security may have started as a noble idea — but it’s high time we stop mistaking a broken promise for a blessing. The truth may sting, but it’s the first step toward justice. And justice is what we’re here for.
Thank you.
(Counsel returns to their seat. Silence. Then a quiet stir in the courtroom, as the truth settles in like a heavy southern summer storm.)
[Courtroom Scene: Opening Statement – Counsel for the Defense, Senator Bernie Sanders]
(Bernie rises. Adjusts his glasses. The room quiets. He stands firm, voice gravelly but impassioned, hands slicing the air with the urgency of justice.)
OPENING STATEMENT – SENATOR BERNIE SANDERS, OPPOSING COUNSEL:
Your Honor… ladies and gentlemen of the jury…
I have heard a lot of things in my life. But never in my decades of public service did I think I’d have to come into a courtroom and defend Social Security — a program that has kept food on the table and roofs over the heads of America’s most vulnerable — from being compared to a Ponzi scheme.
Now let me be crystal clear: Social Security is not a scam. It is not a con. It is a promise kept.
For over 40 years, Social Security has paid every single dollar it owed to every single American who earned it. Not some. Not most. All. That is not a Ponzi scheme — that’s reliability. That’s dignity. That’s justice for working people.
Now, my learned friend — a man who clearly fancies himself the modern-day Mark Twain of finance — has spent the better part of his opening trying to tell you that Social Security is a shell game. And I get it. It’s fun. It’s flashy. He’s got metaphors and charm and a whole lot of smoke. But let’s not mistake storytelling for substance.
So let’s talk about substance.
Right now, Elon Musk — the man who literally called Social Security the “biggest Ponzi scheme of all time” — is worth over $400 billion dollars. And under the current law, he pays the same amount into Social Security as someone making $170,000 a year. That is not just ridiculous. It is unjust.
Meanwhile, half the seniors in this country are scraping by on $30,000 a year. One in five are trying to survive on $15,000. And we are standing here debating whether to protect a program that is, for many, the only thing between them and poverty?
Ladies and gentlemen, this is not a courtroom drama. This is a moral crisis.
Now, I’ve introduced legislation — real, concrete legislation — that simply says: Let’s lift the cap. Let’s ask the wealthiest among us — the folks with more than they could spend in ten lifetimes — to contribute their fair share.
We’re not talking about confiscation. We’re talking about contribution. Because if a nurse working night shifts pays into Social Security every week, so should the billionaire launching himself into space.
And here’s what lifting that cap does: it extends the life of Social Security for 75 years. Not five, not ten — seventy-five. And guess what else? We can increase benefits. Not cut them. Raise them.
So, to my friend who sees only doom and gloom, I say this:
You don’t burn down the house because the roof has a leak.
You don’t throw away the compass because you’re in a storm.
And you sure as hell don’t abandon a program that has worked for generations just because a billionaire thinks he can do better on Joe Rogan’s podcast.
No — you fix what’s broken. You fund what’s needed. You protect the people.
This isn’t a Ponzi scheme. It’s a people’s insurance plan. And the only thing standing in the way of its solvency… is political will.
Let’s stop pretending the sky is falling. The truth is simple: Social Security works. It has always worked. And with just a little courage — and a little fairness — it will keep working for generations to come.
Thank you.
(Senator Sanders returns to his seat. No theatrics. Just quiet resolve.)
[Courtroom Scene – Cross-Examination]
The courtroom murmurs with curiosity as the modern Mark Twain, acting as plaintiff’s counsel, rises from his chair, brushing off the dust of a southern drawl and a twinkle of trouble in his eye. He buttons his coat slowly and turns toward the witness stand.
TWAIN:
“Your Honor, with the court’s permission, I’d like to call a most peculiar fella to the stand — a man whose name is known from Mars to Main Street — Mr. Elon Musk.”
(The gallery stirs. Elon Musk takes the stand, leans into the mic with a curious smirk. Twain approaches, slow and deliberate, like a cat with a sermon.)
TWAIN (leaning on the rail, eyes twinkling):
Now, Mr. Musk… how many young’uns do you have?
MUSK (dryly):
I believe the number is eleven, at last count.
TWAIN (grinning):
Eleven! Lord have mercy, you’re single-handedly keepin’ the census busy. Now tell me, why so many?
MUSK:
Well… I believe we are facing a population collapse crisis. Not enough people being born. I figured I ought to contribute solutions, not just tweets.
TWAIN (nodding slowly):
Mighty noble. But if I may say, it does make your next statement seem a tad peculiar. You see, earlier you called Social Security the “biggest Ponzi scheme of all time.”
Now I just want to understand, coming from a man with enough children to start his own zip code… why do you believe that?
MUSK:
Because people are living much longer than the program was originally designed for. And there are fewer babies being born — fewer new workers to pay into the system. More retirees drawing out, less money coming in. It relies on current contributors to pay current recipients. That’s structurally unsustainable. That’s a Ponzi scheme.
TWAIN (pacing slowly, then stopping to face him):
Let me see if I got this straight… You’re sayin’ that because people are living longer — which I’d wager is a triumph of modern medicine and not a moral failure — and because we’ve got a birthrate issue — which, ironically, you’re trying to solve like a one-man baby boom — that the promise our government made to its workers is suddenly fraudulent?
MUSK (defensive):
The math doesn’t lie.
TWAIN (nodding thoughtfully):
Ah, yes, math — the coldest of companions in the warmest of rooms. But let me ask you this, Mr. Musk: when your engineers run out of battery power in a Tesla, do you call the whole car a scam? Or do you recharge it?
MUSK:
We solve the problem.
TWAIN (leaning in):
So why not do the same here? Why not fix the roof instead of tearing down the house? Or is it that billionaires like yourself just don’t like the idea of lifting the income cap and paying more into the very system you seem so quick to condemn?
(A long pause. Musk shifts slightly. Twain presses in gently, voice soft now, almost sorrowful.)
TWAIN:
You see, Mr. Musk, what I find curious is this: you, of all people, ought to understand investment. You pour money into rockets knowing they’ll crash before they soar. You spend billions on tech that ain’t made a profit yet, believing in what might be.
Social Security — that’s an investment too. But instead of rockets, it’s people. Instead of Mars, it’s Main Street.
And the only reason it might fall short is because some of the richest among us would rather watch it burn than toss in their fair share of kindling.
(He turns to the jury)
Ladies and gentlemen, I leave it to you to decide what kind of nation we want to be. One that keeps its word to its elders… or one that breaks it to protect the fortunes of its elite.
(He tips his hat to the stand.)
Thank you kindly, Mr. Musk.
The courtroom is silent. Somewhere in the back, a reporter scribbles feverishly. The storm has passed, but the air is thick with reckoning.
[Courtroom Scene – Redirect Examination by Senator Bernie Sanders]
(Senator Sanders rises like a sudden gust through an old Vermont barn — no nonsense, sleeves rolled up in spirit if not in form. He strides toward the witness stand where Elon Musk remains seated, calm but visibly bracing. The room tightens in silence.)
SENATOR SANDERS (sternly, without pause):
Mr. Musk, I have just one question for you right now.
Why do you dislike old people so much that you want to close Social Security?
(The courtroom gasps — a mix of shock and curiosity. Bernie’s eyes lock with Elon’s.)
MUSK (raising a brow):
I never said I dislike old people. That’s not what this is about.
SANDERS (voice rising):
Not what it’s about? Then what is it about, Mr. Musk? You stand here — the richest man on the planet — and call the one thing standing between millions of seniors and destitution a Ponzi scheme? You tell working Americans that the system they paid into their whole lives is a fraud?
You say there are too many old people. You say they’re living too long. What exactly is the problem, Mr. Musk? That your generation might have to contribute a bit more to ensure their survival?
MUSK (measured):
I’m simply pointing out that the structure is unsustainable if nothing changes. That’s just basic economics.
SANDERS (leaning in, passionate):
No, Mr. Musk — what’s unsustainable is billionaires hoarding wealth while millions of seniors choose between food and medicine.
You say Social Security is flawed? Fine. Then let’s fix it. But ending it? Gutting it? Calling it a scam? That’s not reform — that’s cruelty with a calculator.
If this were about sustainability, you’d support lifting the income cap. You’d contribute more than the working class janitor who pays the same into the system on a fraction of the income. But instead, you sit atop a mountain of wealth and call the ladder beneath you rotten.
Let me tell you something, Mr. Musk: We don’t abandon our elders. Not in America. Not now. Not ever.
(He turns to the jury, voice steady but burning like an old woodstove.)
So again I ask… why is it always the vulnerable who get called unsustainable? Why not the greed?
Thank you, Your Honor.
(Bernie returns to his seat, fire still in his breath. The courtroom is still. Somewhere in the back, an old man in a veterans cap wipes a tear.)
[Courtroom Scene – Continued Cross-Examination by Mark Twain]
(Mark Twain steps forward again, hands behind his back, rocking gently on his heels like a man about to whittle something sharp out of a crooked stick. The courtroom is still, waiting on his next question. He turns his gaze to Elon Musk with the warmth of a Southern sunrise and the bite of a northern wind.)
TWAIN:
Mr. Musk, humor me with a simple question — why, in your mind, is Social Security broke?
MUSK (leaning forward, calm and mechanical):
The math is simple, really. If you print money to pay an increasing number of seniors, at increasing rates, and your working class isn’t growing fast enough to keep up… then you’re digging a bigger hole every year.
Each time the government creates fake money, inflation rises. And when that happens, it’s seniors — the very people Social Security is supposed to help — who suffer most. Their checks don’t go as far. Groceries go up. Rent goes up. Medicine costs more.
The truth is, the government wastes money on non-existent programs and fraud. We’re trying to stop that fraud so the program actually has a chance.
And let’s be honest — Social Security has been broke since the early 1980s. President Reagan himself said so. That’s why in 1983, they had to pass reforms — raise payroll taxes, increase the retirement age, tax benefits.
People forget: nothing in this world is free. If you waste money over here, you’ve got to pay for it over there. And if you delay the payment ten years, you’re not just paying the bill — you’re paying the interest too.
(Twain nods slowly, the corners of his mouth curling like a riverboat easing into a sharp bend.)
TWAIN (softly, like a man loading powder into a musket):
Now, that is a mighty fine answer, Mr. Musk. Thoughtful. Precise. Almost poetic — in a sort of grim, mechanized way.
But let me ask you somethin’… you ever stop to think who’s been printing all that fake money? Or who built the fraud-riddled machine you’re wagging your finger at?
‘Cause last I checked, it wasn’t the seniors living on $1,200 a month.
(The courtroom chuckles lightly. Twain continues.)
You blame Social Security for being broke, and maybe it is. But it didn’t go broke by accident. It didn’t sneak off to Vegas and gamble away the trust fund. It was robbed — nickel by nickel, year after year — by a government that cared more about fighter jets than feeding widows.
And now that it’s limping, you suggest we put it out of its misery. I reckon that’s like shootin’ the horse because the stable caught fire.
TWAIN (pointing gently at Musk):
You say the math is simple. Well, maybe it is. But here’s my math:
- We’ve got billionaires payin’ less as a percentage than bus drivers.
- We’ve got lobbyists gutting oversight.
- We’ve got tax breaks for yachts and subsidies for corporations that offshore jobs.
But somehow the blame always lands on grandma’s grocery check.
(Twain walks to the center of the courtroom, his voice growing solemn.)
TWAIN:
You say, “nothing in this world is free.” And you’re right. But I’d like to remind this court: dignity ain’t supposed to be a luxury. A warm meal in old age shouldn’t require a stock portfolio. And when a nation makes a promise to its workers — to its soldiers, its teachers, its nurses — it oughta keep it.
Not because it’s profitable…
But because it’s right.
(He turns back to Musk, eyes soft again, voice quiet.)
TWAIN:
So no, Mr. Musk, I don’t think you hate old people. But I do believe you trust numbers more than neighbors. And that, sir, might be the root of all this confusion.
Thank you kindly.
(Twain returns to his table. The jury stares ahead, heavy with thought. Somewhere, a grandfather clutches his pension check a little tighter.)
[Courtroom Scene – Rebuttal from Elon Musk, On the Stand]
(Elon Musk leans into the microphone now, less reserved, his voice carrying a sharpened edge of logic and sarcasm. The gallery leans in.)
MUSK: Look, let’s stop pretending that soaking the rich is going to fix this. Take all the money — all of it — from every billionaire in America. Confiscate the Teslas, the yachts, the stock portfolios, the private islands. Do it.
And guess what?
You still won’t have enough to cover the unfunded liabilities of the United States of America.
Social Security, Medicare, the national debt, the interest… it’s a math problem. You can burn the whole Monopoly board and still not make a dent.
So go ahead, Bernie — make socialism proud. Take everyone’s money. You’ll be broke again in a year.
That’s not an opinion. That’s math.
And maybe — just maybe — you could use a little help with that.
(A pause. Murmurs ripple through the courtroom like a small tremor. Sanders adjusts his glasses. Mark Twain raises an eyebrow. Then Twain stands slowly, looking at the jury with a faint smirk — like he’s seen a boy try to outwit a chess master with checkers.)
TWAIN (under his breath, to no one in particular):
Ah yes… the math argument. The favorite refuge of the man who knows the cost of everything… and the value of nothing.
[The Courtroom falls into a tense silence, as all eyes turn to Senator Sanders for response.]
[Courtroom Scene – Final Question from Mark Twain to Elon Musk, and Objection from Senator Sanders]
(Mark Twain, leaning lazily against the edge of the witness stand, squints at Elon Musk like a man staring down a riddle he already knows the answer to. He fans himself with his notepad before delivering one last slow, deliberate question.)
TWAIN:
Mr. Musk… just one more question before we let you go back to counting satellites and launching dreams.
In your investigation, how many individuals — presumably over 110 years old — are still collecting Social Security benefits?
(A brief silence. Musk smirks, sits forward.)
MUSK:
Last I checked, there were dozens of people supposedly over the age of 110 still receiving benefits… a few even clocked in at 130 years old. I’m not saying they’re time travelers, but I am saying someone is cashing checks.
(Before Twain can respond, Senator Sanders shoots to his feet, face red as Vermont maple in October.)
SENATOR SANDERS (booming):
Objection, Your Honor!
There is no definitive proof that these individuals are deceased! Just because someone is 130 years old does not mean they’re dead! That is ageist, speculative, and disrespectful to the long-living Americans who may still be out there enjoying their golden — or platinum — years!
(The courtroom erupts in scattered laughter and gasps. The judge raises a brow, rapping the gavel once.)
JUDGE (dryly):
Objection… noted. Mr. Twain, stay on track.
TWAIN (nodding, unfazed):
Yes, Your Honor. I shall endeavor not to offend any centenarians or immortals present.
(Turning back to Musk with a wry smile.)
TWAIN:
You see, Mr. Musk… what I’m getting at here — and I think the jury is pickin’ up what I’m layin’ down — is that when a system can’t even tell if its recipients are alive, maybe it ain’t the idea of Social Security that’s broken…
…it’s the management.
(Twain gives a slow tip of the hat, then strolls back to his seat as the courtroom simmers with amusement, tension, and the unmistakable scent of impending closing arguments, but it isn’t so.)
[Courtroom Scene – Twain Calls Milton Friedman as a Witness, Sanders Objects]
(Mark Twain, now in full theatrical stride, turns to the judge with a wicked grin and a twinkle in his eye.)
TWAIN:
Your Honor, I’d like to call another witness to the stand — a man of uncommon wisdom, economic clarity, and a mustache sharp enough to slice government waste clean in half.
I call Mr. Milton Friedman.
(Gasps and laughter ripple through the courtroom. Senator Bernie Sanders immediately leaps from his seat, pointing a finger like a moral compass.)
SENATOR SANDERS (exasperated):
Objection, Your Honor! Milton Friedman is dead! He passed away in 2006! He cannot be called as a witness!
(The judge raises an eyebrow, sighs, and reaches for the gavel. But before he can strike it, Twain spins on his heel, cloak of sarcasm flapping in the air like a rebellious curtain.)
TWAIN (mocking indignation):
Dead?! And since when has being dead disqualified a man from influencing American policy?
Hell, half of Washington’s still taking cues from Thomas Jefferson, and he’s been gone long enough to be dust in Monticello.
And let’s not forget, being dead sure as hell hasn’t stopped centenarians from drawing Social Security or even — dare I say — voting in certain districts.
If you’ll let a 130-year-old vote absentee in Poughkeepsie, then by God, I think Milton Friedman deserves a voice in this room!
(The gallery breaks into laughter and scattered applause. The judge stifles a smile.)
JUDGE (dryly):
Counselor Twain… I’ll allow you to reference Mr. Friedman’s ideas, but the court cannot physically summon the deceased.
TWAIN (nodding):
Very well, Your Honor. I shall call forth his words, if not his bones.
(Turning toward the jury, voice rich with Southern charm and intellectual fire.)
TWAIN:
Milton Friedman once said:
“One of the great mistakes is to judge policies and programs by their intentions rather than their results.”
Now ain’t that just the heart of it?
Social Security — well-intentioned, no doubt. But intentions don’t pay the bills. And if we continue to ignore the math, refuse to fix the leaks, and call every critic a villain, then we’re doing exactly what Friedman warned against:
Confusing charity with sustainability.
(He tips his hat to the judge and turns back toward the witness stand.)
TWAIN:
Thank you for indulging the ghost of a man who understood liberty, personal responsibility, and the difference between a helping hand and a government handout with no end in sight.
[Courtroom Scene – The Spirit of Milton Friedman Testifies via AI Projection]
(The lights dim. A holographic image flickers into view beside the witness stand. The unmistakable face of Milton Friedman, resurrected through the wonders of AI and the persistence of liberty, appears before the court. His voice is calm but resolute, echoing through the chamber like a truth too long suppressed.)
MARK TWAIN (standing proudly):
Your Honor, I present to the court the testimony of Professor Milton Friedman, not risen from the grave — but from the grave mistakes of government promises that were never backed by arithmetic.
Professor Friedman, in your expert view… how would you describe the Social Security program as it stands today?
MILTON FRIEDMAN (via AI):
Let me be very clear: Social Security, as it is structured today, is not a savings program.
It is a tax-and-transfer system — a Ponzi scheme of sorts — where current workers are taxed to pay the benefits of current retirees.
When it was created in the 1930s, the ratio of workers to retirees was high. But demographics change. People live longer. Have fewer children. Retire earlier. Now, fewer workers support more retirees — and the gap continues to grow.
Social Security distorts incentives. It discourages saving by creating the illusion that the government will care for everyone in old age. It penalizes work through payroll taxes. And it transfers money from young workers — often less wealthy — to retirees who may already be relatively secure.
I am not against helping the elderly. But I believe a far better system would be private, voluntary savings accounts — where people own and control their retirement. The government should provide a minimal safety net for those truly in need… but not manage a massive, inefficient system that undermines personal responsibility and economic freedom.
MARK TWAIN (stepping closer):
And if I may press further, Professor — how would you fix it?
MILTON FRIEDMAN (nodding):
Fixing Social Security requires a fundamental shift in thinking. It is not enough to tinker with taxes or move the retirement age like furniture in a burning house. We must restructure the program entirely.
1. Transition to Private Retirement Accounts
Let individuals keep more of what they earn. Allow younger workers to opt out of Social Security. Divert payroll taxes into privately owned accounts — conservatively invested. Guarantee a minimum benefit for those who cannot save enough.
2. Honor Promises to Current Retirees
We made a promise. We must keep it. Preserve benefits for current and near-term retirees. Pay for the transition through budget cuts, asset sales, or temporary borrowing — with a clear endgame.
3. Reduce the Government’s Role
Government should not manage your retirement — you should. Encourage employer plans, private insurance, and voluntary savings. End disincentives to working later in life.
4. Address the Moral Hazard
When people believe the government will care for them no matter what, they stop preparing. The result? A generation that saves less, expects more — and gets disappointed.
The solution is not to make the current system solvent.
The solution is to make it unnecessary.
MARK TWAIN (eyes blazing):
And Professor… what happens when the government spends more than it takes in?
MILTON FRIEDMAN:
Then we enter the spiral:
- The trust fund is drawn down.
- Eventually, it runs out.
- Then the government must raise taxes, cut benefits, raise the retirement age, or borrow more — which simply delays the pain while compounding the interest.
- “When you make promises without the means to keep them… you’re not helping people. You’re deceiving them.”
(Friedman’s hologram fades slowly. The courtroom is silent. Even Bernie Sanders, for the moment, is still. Twain turns to the jury like a preacher turning to his flock — not to convert, but to remind them of a truth already known deep down.)
MARK TWAIN:
So there you have it, ladies and gentlemen. From the mind of a man who understood both freedom and finance.
We don’t need bigger promises.
We need better principles.
And if we want our children to inherit liberty instead of IOUs… we’d best listen, even if the man speaking has been gone a while.
(He bows his head. Then lifts his eyes to the jury, as the final round nears.)
[Courtroom Scene – Cross-Examination by Senator Bernie Sanders: “So You’d Get Rid of Medicare?”]
(Senator Bernie Sanders, eyes ablaze with moral urgency, rises slowly from his seat. He adjusts his coat and steps toward the flickering AI projection of Milton Friedman, now hovering like a ghost of economic principles past.)
SENATOR SANDERS (sharp):
So let me ask you directly, Mr. Friedman…
Are you saying that you would get rid of Medicare?
MILTON FRIEDMAN (AI projection, calm but firm):
Senator, I wouldn’t necessarily say “abolish Medicare tomorrow.”
But I would strongly advocate for shrinking its role and transitioning toward a market-based, individual-centered healthcare system.
SENATOR SANDERS (raising voice):
So the answer is yes — you’d roll back Medicare. A program that today ensures over 65 million Americans, many of them seniors on fixed incomes, receive access to life-saving care.
Is that right?
MILTON FRIEDMAN (measured):
Medicare, like Social Security, began as a well-intentioned solution — and became a runaway train.
It distorts prices, encourages overuse, discourages competition, and drives up costs.
When government sets the price, you get artificial demand and bureaucratic waste.
That is not sustainable. It’s not freedom. It’s dependency.
SENATOR SANDERS (in disbelief):
So instead of a public program where we all pitch in and protect each other, you’d prefer to throw Americans into the free market and say, “Good luck”? That’s not compassion, that’s chaos.
You would rather gamble your dialysis on the Dow Jones?
MILTON FRIEDMAN:
No, Senator. I would empower Americans to manage their care with Health Savings Accounts — starting from a young age — and backstop them with catastrophic insurance.
For those who are truly needy, I support means-tested vouchers to access care in a competitive private market — one driven by innovation, choice, and price transparency.
What I oppose is a universal entitlement that crowds out private solutions, stifles innovation, and leads to rationing.
SENATOR SANDERS (pounding the podium):
What you call “universal entitlement,” I call basic human dignity!
We don’t turn seniors into price shoppers when they’re facing cancer. We don’t tell a grandmother with a broken hip to open a 401(k) for her surgery.
We are the richest nation on Earth, and you would have us return to a world where the poor get charity, and the wealthy get care — and everyone else gets the shaft.
MILTON FRIEDMAN (firm, even):
And yet, Senator, the system you defend continues to spiral out of control. Costs rise. Quality suffers. Innovation slows.
Markets are not perfect — but they respond to real signals. Bureaucracies respond to inertia.
SENATOR SANDERS (pointing):
And what about trust, Mr. Friedman? Trust that we, as a people, will take care of one another? Trust that aging isn’t a punishment, but a natural chapter — and one that should be met with compassion, not co-pays and coupons?
MILTON FRIEDMAN (gently):
And what about freedom, Senator?
Freedom to choose.
Freedom to save.
Freedom to be responsible for oneself — without a centralized authority dictating the terms of care.
It is not compassion to build promises on quicksand.
It is not justice to offer entitlements today that cannot be paid for tomorrow.
(A pause. The courtroom is breathless. Two visions — one rooted in solidarity, the other in sovereignty — collide in philosophical thunder.)
SENATOR SANDERS (quiet now, but firm):
You call it freedom. I call it abandonment.
We’ll let the people decide which version of America they believe in.
(He returns to his seat. The judge exhales. Twain leans in, tips his hat toward Friedman’s projection like he’s just seen the ghost of liberty wrestle with the ghost of justice.)
[Courtroom Scene – Final Exchange: Friedman’s Warning & Twain’s Return]
(The AI-projected image of Milton Friedman flickers to life once again. His face is solemn now, his voice edged with something rare — not just logic, but urgency. The courtroom, packed and hushed, leans in.)
MILTON FRIEDMAN (addressing the court):
Your Honor, if I may… before this great debate concludes, allow me one last reflection.
You see, in a utopia, everything is possible.
In a spreadsheet, everything can be balanced.
But in the real world — governed by human nature, finite resources, and time — there are hard truths that no ideology, left or right, can escape.
It used to be that your children took care of you. They paid your medical bills — out of their pockets, out of love, out of duty — or yes, through Medicare. But now we are down to great-grandchildren carrying the burden.
And when there are fewer of them, and people keep living longer, but working less… the equation collapses.
Soon, the only “solution” the system will have left is something unthinkable:
A cap on age.
Because nature, economics, the cosmos itself — they all operate on limits. And when you stretch them too far, they snap back.
Hard.
If young people — in their 20s and 30s — don’t work, don’t have kids, don’t create, don’t produce…
And if the old depend on systems that only work when the young outnumber them…
We will face a global reset.
And here in America, where we live on the privilege of First Nation Status — the economic, military, and cultural dominance that lets us print debt and the world still buys it — that status is not eternal.
If we lose it…
If the dollar ceases to be the world’s trusted reserve…
If investors demand higher interest to trust our debt…
Interest rates will double.
Maybe triple.
And as the rappers say — forgive my academic tone —
“We are F’ed up. Really bad.”
(The courtroom murmurs, stunned. Then Twain slowly rises, brushing the dust of destiny off his coat, stepping back into the spotlight like a man born for the moment.)
MARK TWAIN (eyes twinkling, voice low):
Professor… I thank you for your candor. FED UP that is cute, Yeah, too much Fed in all this.
But for the benefit of the jury — and maybe a few folks in the back row still scratching their heads — let me ask you this one last thing:
What does it mean to lose First Nation Status?
MILTON FRIEDMAN (somber):
It means losing the privilege of being the world’s economic anchor.
Right now, America issues debt — trillions of it — and the world buys it. They buy our Treasury bonds. They trust our dollar. They treat us as the safest bet on the planet.
That trust is what lets us borrow cheaply, spend freely, and delay the consequences of bad decisions.
But if that trust is lost — if we are no longer seen as the safest, smartest, strongest economy —
then everything changes.
Interest rates spike.
Inflation runs wild.
The cost of living soars.
The debt becomes unpayable.
And the empire, as history has shown countless times… begins to crumble.
(A long silence. Twain nods slowly. He walks toward the jury, hands behind his back like a humble preacher at the edge of revelation.)
MARK TWAIN:
There you have it, folks.
You can’t lie to the ledger forever. You can’t spend tomorrow’s harvest on today’s feast and expect the field to forgive you.
Whether you favor markets or mandates, capitalism or care, you must admit:
We are running out of road.
And maybe — just maybe — it’s time we stopped shouting at each other across the aisle, and started telling the truth.
Because truth, unlike fiat money… never goes bankrupt.
(Twain tips his hat. The AI projection of Friedman flickers, then fades. The courtroom waits, heavy with understanding, the final words echoing like a bell at the edge of a new day.)
[Courtroom Scene – Final Closing Arguments]
The moment has come. The jury sits upright. The gallery holds its collective breath. A nation’s conscience is on trial. First, the defender of the system rises — sleeves rolled, heart pounding.
Closing Argument – Senator Bernie Sanders
(Defending Social Security & Medicare)
SENATOR SANDERS (passionate, unwavering):
Ladies and gentlemen of the jury…
We’ve heard a lot in this courtroom. Talk of Ponzi schemes, price signals, cosmic resets, and even resurrected economists. But let me bring this home where it belongs — to the people.
Because that’s who we’re talking about.
Not spreadsheets.
Not theories.
People.
That woman stocking shelves at 65 because her pension dried up?
That veteran living on $1,200 a month trying to decide between groceries and insulin?
That grandfather who paid into the system for 40 years and now leans on a Social Security check like it’s a lifeline — because it is?
That is who Social Security serves. That is who Medicare protects.
Now my esteemed opponent — Mr. Twain — and his ghostly consultant Mr. Friedman, argue that this system is broken. And I don’t disagree that reform is needed. But their solution is not reform. It is retreat.
They would have you throw the safety net into the marketplace — as if Wall Street has ever worried about Main Street.
They say freedom is the answer.
But I ask: Freedom for who?
The freedom to grow old and poor?
The freedom to die without care?
The freedom to depend on the invisible hand — which, more often than not, is invisible when you need it most?
No, friends. A civilized society takes care of its elders.
It honors its promises.
It believes that security in old age is not socialism — it’s solidarity.
So yes, let’s strengthen the system.
Let’s tax the billionaires who’ve had a free ride.
Let’s invest in oversight, root out fraud, and expand care — not cut it.
Because we are not broke.
We are imbalanced.
And the answer to imbalance is justice, not abandonment.
Let’s not tear down the house because the roof leaks.
Let’s fix the roof — together.
Thank you.
(He sits. The room is still. Then slowly, the slow, deliberate figure of Mark Twain rises once more, dusting his hat with a sigh and a grin.)
Closing Argument – Mark Twain
(Challenging Social Security & Medicare’s Current Structure)
MARK TWAIN (measured, reflective, cutting with kindness):
Ladies and gentlemen…
I was born before the telephone and after the musket — and still, in all my time, I never heard of a government program that didn’t grow fat, lazy, and delusional when no one was allowed to say:
“Maybe this ain’t workin’ anymore.”
Now I tip my hat to Senator Sanders. His heart’s in the right place — and that place is the kitchen table of every struggling American. But what he refuses to admit is that the very table is about to collapse under the weight of false promises and math that don’t add up.
Yes, Social Security helped generations.
Yes, Medicare brought comfort to many.
But folks, intentions are not outcomes.
If you build a house of cards with good intentions, it still collapses in the wind.
And that’s what we’ve got:
- A system where young folks pay in, but don’t believe it’ll be there for them.
- A government that borrows against tomorrow to pay for yesterday.
- And a public so used to being “taken care of” that it’s forgotten how to take care of itself.
Now we can pretend this is sustainable.
Or we can face it like grown-ups.
Professor Friedman spoke of liberty, responsibility, and ownership. Not because he lacked compassion — but because he had the courage to say:
“A program that can’t keep its promises is not noble. It’s deceitful.”
I don’t stand here to kill Social Security. I stand here to free it from the shackles of denial.
I don’t want to gut Medicare. I want to remind the people that care doesn’t come from bureaucracy — it comes from responsibility, innovation, and trust.
If we lose First Nation Status, it won’t be because we cared too little —
It’ll be because we spent too much, saved too little, and told too many lies.
So let’s fix this house.
But let’s not patch the roof with borrowed shingles.
Let’s rebuild the foundation — with truth.
That’s all I’ve got.
The rest, as they say, is up to the jury.
(He nods. The room stands still, hovering between idealism and realism, heart and mind, security and freedom.)
JUDGE:
The case of “The People vs. the Promise” is now in your hands.
The jury exits. America waits.
Would you like a jury verdict, or perhaps a fictional public reaction after the trial?
0
